Innocent until proven guilty – or so I’ve always learned.

Jan 27, 2009

The miscarriages of justice made possible by the two acronyms I loathe the most (RIAA, MPAA) just keeps piling on it seems. First it was the lawsuits against dead people and infants. RIAA recently announced their decision to stop pressing these lawsuits.
 
Later on there was the suggestion of three strikes legislation to fight piracy – first accusation gained you a warning, the second meant your bandwidth would get strangled, and with the third accusation you’d lose your net connection altogether.
 
Most recently, I learned that New Zealand are planning an even stricter law: upon the first accusation, you are immediately assumed guilty, and your connection is cut.
 
Now, I believe very strongly in the principle of the accused being assumed innocent until proven otherwise. For an assembly of elected officials to even think of proposing a law like this should be anathema, never mind actually really looking to put it into legislation.
 
You can think whatever you will of piracy, filesharing and so on, this is just wrong.

Posted by razumny | Categories: Op-Ed | Tagged: , , , , , , |

Share with others

No Responses so far | Have Your Say!

All comments are moderated. I usually publish a comment within twelve hours of its posting. Other than that, I have a few simple rules; feel free to disagree with me, but stay on topic, and behave yourself. Comments containing insults, libel etc. will not be published. Your right to free speech does not mean I must publish what you write.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>